Disapplication of an Option to tax

Disapplication of an Option to tax

Moulsdale Properties appealed a decision by the First-Tier Tribunal to uphold an option to tax on a property, resulting in its sale being taxable for VAT purposes. On appeal, the case was heard by the Upper Tribunal.

The Appellant purchased the property in 2001 and opted to tax before leasing to a connected party which made exempt supplies. As the value of the property was over £250,000, it qualified for the Capital Goods Scheme and as such, under the anti-avoidance legislation, the appellant considered that the option to tax was disapplied and all payments relating to the leasing of the property were exempt from VAT. On selling the property to CSPV (an unregistered business who did not opt to tax the property on purchase), Moulsdale Properties did not charge VAT on the sale on the basis that the option to tax had been disapplied.

The defining factor of this case was whether Moulsdale Properties intended that the land would become a capital item in CSPV’s hands. If so, the option to tax would be disapplied and the sale exempt from VAT. The Upper Tribunal agreed with the First-Tier Tribunal that, due to the Appellant anticipating the sale to be exempt, they did not expect the property to be a capital item. Consequently, the option to tax was upheld and the sale of the property was taxable.

Due to the large sums of money involved in property transactions, it is crucial to ensure that the VAT treatment is correct to prevent any unpleasant surprises down the road. To clarify your VAT position, seek expert advice through our free helpline.

Related posts

Place of supply of services

A case was recently heard by the Upper Tribunal relating to the place of supply of services made by the Appellant, Mandarin Consulting Ltd, who provided career coaching to students of Chinese origin.

D.I.Y Builders Scheme

Mr Smith, the Appellant in this instance, converted a barn adjoining his property into living accommodation for which planning permission was obtained. In 2007, when 60% of the work had been completed, Mr Smith became aware that he may be able to recover the VAT element of the costs incurred in the course of converting the barn by way of the DIY builder's scheme and a claim was subsequently submitted.

Input Tax Recovery - Intending Trader

The VAT recovery position of intending traders has formed the basis of several court decisions in recent times, and this was again addressed in the case of Hedge Fund Investment Management Ltd (“HFIML”), heard by the First-Tier Tribunal. HMRC had raised an assessment in relation to input tax recovered by the business, on the basis that there was no link to any taxable economic activity. Furthermore, a penalty assessment was raised in relation to the recovery of this input tax for careless behaviour.